Risk-Driven Cross-Layer Resilience Architecture for UAV Swarms Under Extreme Wind Disturbances

Le résumé fourni par la source

Typhoon-eye sensing places unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarms in a setting where the wind field that carries the target signal also displaces aircraft, drains energy, weakens links, and increases failure risk. A rule that improves only routing or only motion can therefore move the swarm into another failure mode. This paper proposes a risk-driven cross-layer coordination scheme for such missions. A bounded risk index, computed from isolation, connectivity loss, and wind intensity, acts as a supervisory variable for multi-hop reachability maintenance, isolated-node recovery, and layered altitude adaptation. For evaluation, graph reachability is separated from useful data return through a degraded multi-hop aggregation model that includes distance loss, wind-dependent reliability, rain-induced packet loss, relay forwarding loss, and mothership collection capacity. The simulator combines a bounded Holland-type storm field, stochastic turbulence, nonlinear propulsion energy consumption, and wind-dependent structural failure. Against three literature-inspired baselines, two AI-inspired comparators, and six ablation variants, the method keeps a balanced profile across connectivity, isolation, wind exposure, data collection, and survival. In 30-run steady-state robustness tests under heavy-rain attenuation, the full strategy showed clear gains over routing-only and multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL)-routing comparators in connectivity and isolation, but did not uniformly dominate topology reconstruction or the multi-agent deep deterministic policy gradient–artificial potential field (MADDPG-APF) recovery comparator. The results indicate that, in storm-dominated swarm sensing, resilience comes mainly from coordinating exposure reduction with topology stabilization, rather than from optimizing a single layer.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.