Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 review

Differences in Circulating Inflammatory Markers in Older Adults With and Without Sarcopenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
5Institutions déclarées
3Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Objectives In this systematic review and meta-analysis, mean differences among high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP), CRP, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), the most common markers used in clinical practice, between older adults with and without sarcopenia based on established consensus were explored. Design A random-effects model meta-analysis was used to estimate the pooled effects of the included studies (CRD42024503466). Heterogeneity was assessed via meta-regressions, whereas publication bias was evaluated through Egger's test and funnel plots. Setting and Participants Forty-four studies with cross-sectional baseline data were included in this study. Methods Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines, a systematic literature search of studies was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus. Results Sarcopenia exhibited a significant higher inflammatory profile compared with those without sarcopenia (CRP: standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.27; 95% CI, 0.14-0.40; I 2 = 82%; P < .01), (high-sensitivity CRP: SMD, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.20-0.60; I 2 = 79%; P < .01), (IL-6: SMD, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.12-0.56; I 2 = 72%; P < .01), (tumor necrosis factor-alpha: SMD, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.25-1.32; I 2 = 92%; P < .01). Overall, the quality of the studies was considered low. Publication bias was found in relation to IL-6, for which, following trim of 6 studies, an insignificant effect between groups was observed (SMD, 0.12; 95% CI, −0.38 to 0.61). Conclusions and Implications This meta-analysis showed a higher level of inflammation in sarcopenia vs nonsarcopenia. Longitudinal studies controlling for reported comorbidities and infections are needed to establish causality.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Differences in Circulating Inflammatory Markers in Older Adults With and Without Sarcopenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Date Crossref
01/09/2026
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Nutrition and Health in AgingFrailty in Older AdultsAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.