The Next Phase of 3D Bioprinting: AI-Native Systems—A Narrative Review
Rattachement africain : rs. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting has reached a complexity limit where empirical, parameter-by-parameter optimization no longer scales. The dominant mode of artificial intelligence (AI) integration remains AI-augmented, where AI is treated as an analytical addition to a conventional pipeline. We argue that the field is approaching a discontinuous transition towards AI-native bioprinting, in which AI represents the operational layer of system intelligence, not an ancillary tool. A systematic analysis of 365 publications on the intersection of bioprinting and AI (2015-2026), performed through 18 queries organized by the four search axes of the PubMed database, shows that the intersection grew 136 times during the decade, with an acceleration of 3.16 times only between 2024 and 2025. Mapping the publications to the six functional domains reveals a marked asymmetry: clinical translation counts 154 papers, while cell viability prediction-the biological foundation that every closed-loop system requires-counts only three. We define AI-native bioprinting as a system architecture that combines continuous learning, multi-modal sensing fused through visual, mechanical and biological signals, and biologically closed control loops. We present a conceptual shift from printing accuracy to biological intelligence as a success criterion. The transition requires open datasets, consensus biological metrics, inter-laboratory validation, and early regulatory engagement.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The Next Phase of 3D Bioprinting: AI-Native Systems—A Narrative Review
- Date Crossref
- 03/07/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
University of Kragujevac Institute for Information Technologies Kragujevac pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Institute for Information Technologies Kragujevac pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
-
Faculty of Medical Sciences Department of Medical Statistics and Informatics pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Institute for Information Technologies Kragujevac — University of Kragujevac, Institute for Information Technologies Kragujevac et Department of Medical Statistics and Informatics — Faculty of Medical Sciences.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.