Effective treatment of human breast tumors by chimeric CCL2 and CCL8 diphtheria toxin cytotoxic peptides
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: Chemokine receptors play crucial roles in tumor onset and progression, but the high redundancy between ligands and their receptors limits the possibilities to leverage them therapeutically for cancer management. To overcome this limitation, we developed chimeric chemokine peptides in which CCL2 and CCL8 were conjugated to diphtheria toxin (DT) and evaluated their antitumor activity. METHODS: . RESULTS: Both analogs were cytotoxic to breast cancer cells in vitro and produced significant anticancer activity in vivo in mice bearing human breast cancer lines and hormone-negative breast cancer patient-derived xenografts (PDXs). In vitro, the peptide conjugates exhibited overlapping uptake profiles, with about 80% of the breast cancer cells being positive for both peptides and about 15%-20% of the cells being negative for either or both of the cytotoxic peptides. In tumor explants cultured ex vivo, simultaneous positivity for DTCCL2 and DTCCL8 increased to >95%, with less than 5% of the cells showing neither DTCCL8 nor DTCCL2 uptake. Treatment of breast cancer-bearing mice with DTCCL8 or DTCCL2 significantly inhibited tumor growth and prolonged survival in the PDX model. CONCLUSION: These results support the feasibility of cytotoxic peptide conjugates for breast cancer management and show that receptor expression profiles in vitro do not accurately forecast tumoral positivity.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Effective treatment of human breast tumors by chimeric CCL2 and CCL8 diphtheria toxin cytotoxic peptides
- Date Crossref
- 02/07/2026
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.