Twenty-Year Trends in Antipsychotic Utilization in Serbia: A Nationwide Drug Utilization Study
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background/Objectives: Antipsychotic drug utilization has changed substantially over recent decades, reflecting evolving prescribing practices, drug availability, and treatment guidelines. Methods: This study analyzed national antipsychotic consumption in Serbia from 2006 to 2024 using official data from the Medicines and Medical Devices Agency of Serbia. Utilization was expressed as defined daily doses per 1,000 inhabitants per day, and trends were assessed using linear and joinpoint regression analyses. Results: Total antipsychotic utilization increased from 4.35 to 14.42 DDD/1,000 inhabitants/day, representing a 231.5% increase. This growth was predominantly driven by atypical antipsychotics, whose utilization increased from 1.16 to 10.91 DDD/1,000 inhabitants/day (+840.2%). In contrast, typical antipsychotic utilization remained relatively stable in absolute terms. The share of atypical antipsychotics increased from 26.7% in 2006 to 75.6% in 2024, while the atypical : typical utilization ratio increased from 0.36 to 3.10. Atypical antipsychotics surpassed typical agents in 2013. Marked increases were observed for olanzapine, quetiapine, aripiprazole, paliperidone, risperidone, and clozapine, while chlorpromazine and fluphenazine declined. Conclusion: These findings demonstrate a substantial increase in overall antipsychotic utilization in Serbia and a pronounced structural shift toward atypical agents, highlighting the need for continued monitoring of prescribing trends, safety outcomes, and population-level treatment patterns.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Twenty-Year Trends in Antipsychotic Utilization in Serbia: A Nationwide Drug Utilization Study
- Date Crossref
- 01/07/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.