Ice-core break-off as an opportunistic seismic source on the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream
Rattachement africain : gb, fr, de, ch. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract. Ice-core drilling generates repeated mechanical disturbances within the ice column, raising the possibility that operational drilling signals could be used as opportunistic seismic sources. We test whether impulsive ice-core break-off events during the 2022 EastGRIP (Greenland) field season can be detected on surface-based, near-offset three-component geophones and used to estimate apparent P-wave velocity. A catalogue of 67 candidate core-break times was identified from drill-log load peaks, of which 37 had sufficient simultaneous near-offset seismic station coverage for assessment. Only three of these assessable events produced plausible impulsive arrivals. Automatic STA/LTA triggering was useful for identifying candidate windows, but did not reliably pick first arrivals. Where clear arrivals were identifiable above the background noise, manually picked arrivals gave apparent P-wave velocities consistent with firn/ice propagation, and showed a small across-flow faster-than-along-flow tendency, though this difference remains below the level of uncertainty required for robust anisotropy interpretation. These results show that ice-core break-off may provide a useful opportunistic seismic source, but only if future deployments include direct source-time measurement, quiet acquisition conditions, and receiver geometries designed for this purpose.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Ice-core break-off as an opportunistic seismic source on the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream
- Date Crossref
- 02/07/2026
- Éditeur
- Copernicus GmbH
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.