Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Radiofrequency ablation produces stiffer atrial lesions than pulsed-field ablation: In vivo and ex vivo magnetic resonance elastography in pigs

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
6Institutions déclarées
3Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency and pulsed-field ablation are mechanistically distinct, yet no validated noninvasive imaging method has directly quantified how they differentially alter atrial tissue biomechanics in vivo or over time. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare acute and chronic atrial lesion stiffness after focal radiofrequency ablation (F-RFA) and focal monopolar pulsed-field ablation (F-PFA) using a novel multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography (MMRE) technique in a porcine model. METHODS: Linear posterior intercaval right atrial lesions were created in 25 pigs (⁓50 kg), using F-RFA (25 W, 30 seconds), F-PFA (25 A, 10 pulse trains), or both. MMRE-derived shear wave speed, a surrogate of tissue stiffness, was measured in vivo ∼3 hours after ablation (acute, n = 17) and at 6 weeks (chronic, n = 8). Acute ex vivo tabletop magnetic resonance elastography on excised lesion samples served as an independent mechanical reference. RESULTS: Acutely, transmural F-RFA lesions were stiffer than transmural F-PFA lesions by both methods: tabletop magnetic resonance elastography 6.40 m/s vs 3.65 m/s (P = .008) and in vivo MMRE 2.23 m/s vs 1.90 m/s (P = .041). By 6 weeks, neither of the groups demonstrated a significant temporal change in stiffness; however, a strong trend toward higher shear wave speed in F-RFA lesions than F-PFA lesions persisted (2.29 m/s vs 1.79 m/s; P = .057). CONCLUSION: In this porcine model, F-RFA produced acutely stiffer atrial lesions than F-PFA, with this trend persisting over 6 weeks. The novel in vivo MMRE technique enables, for the first time, noninvasive longitudinal quantification of atrial lesion stiffness in a large animal, providing a translational platform for energy selection and lesion maturation.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Radiofrequency ablation produces stiffer atrial lesions than pulsed-field ablation: In vivo and ex vivo magnetic resonance elastography in pigs
Date Crossref
01/07/2026
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Cardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.