Data from Integrated Chronic In Vivo and In Vitro Screens Uncover NFIL3 as a Driver of T-cell Dysfunction
Résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) therapy has transformed the treatment landscape for hematologic malignancies, but its efficacy in solid tumors is limited, owing in part to insufficient functional persistence of the engineered T cells. To elucidate the basis for their functional decline, we conducted integrated chronic in vivo and in vitro screens of 400 transcription factors, which revealed NFIL3 as a driver of CAR T-cell dysfunction. Genetic disruption of NFIL3 in CAR T cells sustains their expansion and increases cytokine production, overall restraining terminal differentiation. Loss of NFIL3 enhances CAR T-cell efficacy, improving tumor control and prolonging survival in xenograft and syngeneic mouse tumor models across different CAR designs. Under chronic stimulation, disruption of NFIL3 establishes a transcriptional state predictive of favorable clinical outcomes. Our findings underscore the power of comprehensive in vivo genetic screens integrated with multiparameter in vitro assessment and identify NFIL3 as a novel therapeutic target to enhance cancer immunotherapy. Significance: This study presents a two-step screening framework, integrating an in vivo pooled guide RNA screen with a multiparameter, in vitro arrayed screen. NFIL3 emerged as the top candidate, and its disruption enhanced CAR T-cell antitumor efficacy in both hematologic malignancies and solid tumors across diverse CAR architectures.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Data from Integrated Chronic <i>In Vivo</i> and <i>In Vitro</i> Screens Uncover <i>NFIL3</i> as a Driver of T-cell Dysfunction
- Date Crossref
- 01/07/2026
- Éditeur
- American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.