Prior-informed conditional Gaussian graphical models: an application to protein interaction network reconstruction
Résumé fourni par la source
Protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks, estimated from high-throughput omics data, foster biomarker discovery and precision medicine. Gaussian graphical models (GGMs) offer a principled reconstruction framework. Yet, existing applications face two limitations: they overlook the rich existing knowledge encoded in curated biological databases, and they assume a homogeneous network structure across all individuals, neglecting the influence of covariates or confounding factors on these interactions and preventing personalised representations. Even though these limitations have been addressed separately in previous work, no current approach resolves them simultaneously. We introduce a prior-informed conditional Gaussian graphical model that integrates database-derived interaction priors with covariate-dependent network modeling in a unified, scalable framework. The key methodological innovation is a structured, weighted penalty that selectively incorporates priors into population-level network estimation, while leaving context-specific perturbations entirely data-driven, as curated databases capture canonical interactions rather than disease-specific signals. Simulation studies demonstrate consistent and robust improvements in population-level network reconstruction across diverse settings, even when prior knowledge is imperfect. Applied to UK Biobank cardiometabolic proteomics (n = 49,129, p = 366 proteins), the method recovers T2D-associated network perturbations, identifying 34 network-central candidate biomarkers, several detectable only through their connectivity, not differential expression, and revealing six biologically coherent protein communities with distinct pathway enrichments spanning metabolic, cardiovascular, and cancer-related processes. Code is available at https://github.com/AlessiaMapelli/Prior-informed-conditional-GGMs.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.