Development and Pilot Evaluation of a Training-of-Trainers Model for School-Based Sexuality Education Within the ESPRIT Project
Résumé fourni par la source
Background: Sexuality education is essential for adolescent health and well-being, yet in Italy it is not included in a mandatory national curriculum, resulting in heterogeneous implementation across regions. Within the ESPRIT project, a multidisciplinary training-of-trainers (ToT) model was developed to prepare professionals to support school-based peer-education pathways. This study aimed to describe the training model and perform a pilot evaluation of short-term knowledge outcomes among trained participants. Methods: A pilot non-randomized controlled comparative study was conducted within the ESPRIT project framework. A multidisciplinary Training Team developed a structured ToT pathway based on WHO guidance, national recommendations, and peer-education models. Ten advanced public health residents in Hygiene and Preventive Medicine attended a three-day residential training course. One month later, a 10-item knowledge questionnaire was administered to trained participants (n = 10) and untrained advanced public health residents (n = 10). Results: Trained participants achieved higher questionnaire scores than the comparator group (median score 8 [IQR 2] vs. 3.5 [IQR 2]; p < 0.0005). Conclusions: Structured ToT programmes may represent a promising approach for strengthening professional preparation in sexuality education. Larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to evaluate sustainability and real-world implementation.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Development and Pilot Evaluation of a Training-of-Trainers Model for School-Based Sexuality Education Within the ESPRIT Project
- Date Crossref
- 26/06/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.