Osteoporosis Beyond Awareness: Cross-National Differences in Preventive Deficits, Pharmacological Exposure, and Risk Clustering in Romania and Tunisia

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Osteoporosis is increasingly understood as a complex population health condition shaped by interacting behavioral, metabolic, pharmacological, and healthcare system determinants rather than isolated skeletal risk factors. However, comparative studies integrating these dimensions across distinct healthcare and sociocultural settings remain scarce. We aimed to characterize cross-national differences in osteoporosis-related risk clustering between Romanian and Tunisian adults using an integrative multidimensional framework. Methods: We performed a comparative cross-sectional analysis of harmonized data from two pharmacy-based studies conducted in Romania and Tunisia, including adults aged ≥ 40 years (n = 349). Osteoporosis-related knowledge, lifestyle and metabolic risk factors, pharmacological exposures, preventive behaviors, and treatment patterns were assessed. Multivariable regression and mediation analyses were used to identify independent predictors of screening uptake and to evaluate the relationship between knowledge and preventive behavior. An exploratory cumulative preventive deficit score was used to estimate overall preventive burden within the pharmacy-based study sample. Results: Romanian participants demonstrated significantly higher osteoporosis knowledge than Tunisian participants (8.90 ± 2.20 vs. 7.83 ± 2.99; p < 0.001); however, knowledge was not independently associated with Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) uptake and did not mediate country-related differences in screening behavior. Compared with the Romanian cohort, the Tunisian cohort exhibited lower DXA screening rates (11.2% vs. 22.8%; p = 0.005), lower vitamin D supplementation (11.9% vs. 38.6%; p < 0.001), greater sedentary behavior, and a significantly higher cumulative preventive deficit burden (3.39 ± 1.08 vs. 2.77 ± 1.26; p < 0.001). Medication-related osteoporosis risk was also greater in Tunisia, particularly due to markedly higher corticosteroid exposure (7.5% vs. 0.5%; p = 0.002). Despite this less favorable preventive profile, the treatment gap among participants with diagnosed osteoporosis was significantly lower in Tunisia than in Romania (4.8% vs. 42.9%; p = 0.003). Conclusions: Distinct but convergent osteoporosis-related risk patterns were identified across the two populations, suggesting that osteoporosis vulnerability emerges through context-specific clustering of behavioral, pharmacological, and healthcare-access determinants rather than through isolated risk factors alone. The dissociation between knowledge and preventive behavior highlights the limited impact of awareness-based strategies when structural barriers remain unaddressed. These findings support a shift toward integrated, population-tailored osteoporosis prevention models that incorporate healthcare-system, medication-related, and behavioral determinants, in addition to conventional educational approaches.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.