Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Consensus on curriculum design for a person-centred leadership learning programme—a delphi study

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
7Institutions déclarées
3Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : gb, nl, dk. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Introduction: The creation of person-centred cultures in health care settings is understood as a pre requisite to the provision of person-centred practice. Such cultures need systematic facilitation by health care leaders. While there are few empirically informed theoretical models for person-centred leadership and many organisations internationally, educate leaders in how to transform cultures to become more person-centred, there is lack of consensus on how person-centred leadership can be developed and no high quality, multi-centre evaluations of their effectiveness or impact. Before such evaluations can be undertaken an agreed curriculum is necessary. Only by having this can the fidelity of a leadership programme, subject to evaluation, be maintained. Methods: This study sought to gain international expert consensus on a curriculum for person-centred leadership using a modified Delphi method. Delphi studies employ anonymous and confidential survey methods to ensure expert consensus can be achieved without the interference of influential voices or group coalitions. They typically include two or more rounds with controlled feedback between rounds. We developed curriculum components by undertaking a literature review to identify programmes and theoretical models for person-centred leadership alongside a mapping of current person-centred leadership programmes being delivered by members of an international community of practice committed to the development of person-centred practice. We recruited experts using snowball recruitment. In round 1 we focused on seeking consensus on 16 curriculum components and 6 pedagogical delivery principles and offered the opportunity to comment on the phrasing or clarity of any components or propose additional components. Results: Round 1 resulted in consensus of ≥70% for all components. All bar one had consensus of ≥80%. In round 2 consensus was achieved for all components (≥80% and a mode of 5). Discussion: Using a modified Delphi study approach we have developed an internationally critiqued curriculum framework for person- centred leadership programmes, specific enough to ensure the fidelity of future programme delivery whilst providing sufficient flexibility for appropriate cultural modification within any complex intervention evaluation study. Research is now needed to evaluate the impact of engagement with this curriculum on healthcare leaders' self-views; enacted leadership behaviours and practices; health care cultures and other relevant patient and staff outcomes.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Consensus on curriculum design for a person-centred leadership learning programme—a delphi study
Date Crossref
30/06/2026
Éditeur
Frontiers Media SA
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Management and Organizational StudiesDelphi Technique in ResearchPsychiatric care and mental health services

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.