Preoperative Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Adverse In-Hospital Outcomes in Geriatric Patients with Cardiovascular Disease Undergoing Non-Cardiac Surgery: A Secondary Cohort Analysis

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Older adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery are vulnerable to perioperative complications, but the prognostic value of routine echocardiographic markers in high-acuity cohorts remains incompletely defined. Methods: This secondary analysis of a prospective cohort included 503 consecutive adults with known cardiovascular disease undergoing non-cardiac surgery, characterized by a high proportion of urgent presentations. Patients were stratified by age (geriatric, ≥65 years; non-geriatric, <65 years). The primary endpoint was major in-hospital adverse events (MIAEs), defined as a composite of in-hospital death, surgical reintervention, and postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI). Postoperative creatinine was not routinely measured in stable patients discharged early; therefore, renal outcomes were interpreted strictly as available-case analyses (n = 364). Results: MIAEs occurred more frequently in geriatric than in younger patients (45.5% vs. 30.8%). Within the geriatric cohort, patients with reduced LVEF (<50%) had lower MAPSE values and higher crude rates of AKI, death, and MIAE than those with LVEF ≥ 50%. In multivariable analyses, reduced LVEF was associated with MIAE, although this small subgroup was susceptible to statistical overfitting. MAPSE reflected longitudinal systolic dysfunction but did not retain independent prognostic value after adjustment. Conclusions: In this pilot subgroup analysis of high-acuity patients, reduced preoperative LVEF (<50%) served as a clinical flag identifying a high-risk geriatric phenotype with increased cardiorenal vulnerability. Given the event-enriched available-case denominator, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating observations intended to increase clinical awareness.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.