A comparative study of CNN and vision transformer architectures for fault detection in small wind turbine blades
Résumé fourni par la source
Automated fault detection in wind turbine blades is critical for ensuring the reliability and operational efficiency of wind energy systems. This study presents a systematic comparative analysis of five state-of-the-art deep learning architectures for binary fault classification (healthy versus faulty) on the CAI-SWTB dataset, comprising 6,000 RGB images of small wind turbine blades. The evaluated architectures span three distinct design paradigms: a classical Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) (ResNet-50), a modern CNN (EfficientNetV2-S), and three Vision Transformer (ViT)-based models (ViT-B/16, Data-efficient Image Transformer (DeiT)-S/16, and Swin-Tiny). All models were trained using a two-stage transfer learning protocol with ImageNet-pretrained weights, employing the AdamW optimizer and a cosine annealing learning rate schedule. EfficientNetV2-S achieved the highest classification performance with 99.75% accuracy, followed by ResNet-50 at 99.42%. Among the transformer-based models, Swin-Tiny outperformed both ViT-B/16 (65.33%) and DeiT-S/16 (82.75%), achieving 88.25% accuracy. Grad-CAM analysis confirmed that the best-performing models correctly localize structural defect regions in blade images, supporting their interpretability and suitability for real-world inspection applications.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A comparative study of CNN and vision transformer architectures for fault detection in small wind turbine blades
- Date Crossref
- 30/06/2026
- Éditeur
- Türkiye Enerji Stratejileri ve Politikalari Araştirma Merkezi (TESPAM)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.