FACTORS INFLUENCING RICE FARMERS' INTENTION OF SMART FARMING TECHNOLOGY IN KANIGORO VILLAGE, MALANG REGENCY
Rattachement africain : id. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The adoption of smart farming technology among rice farmers in Kanigoro Village, Pagelaran Subdistrict, remains low despite the availability of tools designed to enhance agricultural efficiency. Technologies such as the Smart Soil Sensor and Bird Control Sound System are still underutilized, reflecting a gap between technological availability and farmer adoption. This study analyzes the influence of attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control on farmers’ intention to adopt smart farming technology, using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) as the analytical framework. A total of 100 farmers were surveyed through structured questionnaires and direct interviews, with data analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results indicate that all three variables significantly affect intention: attitude (β = 0.19, p = 0.023), subjective norm (β = 0.33, p < 0.001), and perceived behavioral control (β = 0.42, p < 0.001). Perceived behavioral control emerged as the strongest predictor, followed by subjective norm and attitude. These findings highlight that enhancing adoption requires not only promoting positive attitudes but also strengthening social support and improving farmers’ confidence in their ability to access and operate smart farming technologies
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- FACTORS INFLUENCING RICE FARMERS' INTENTION OF SMART FARMING TECHNOLOGY IN KANIGORO VILLAGE, MALANG REGENCY
- Date Crossref
- 18/06/2026
- Éditeur
- Institute of Research and Community Services Diponegoro University (LPPM UNDIP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.