Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

In-Stent Stenosis or Occlusion After Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients Treated With Anticoagulants vs Antiplatelet Therapy

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Introduction: Rise in anticoagulant use increases the likelihood that patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS) are on anticoagulants. This complicates postprocedural antithrombotic management, as dual antiplatelet therapy is standard to reduce stent-related complications. To mitigate bleeding risks, patients on anticoagulants often briefly receive a single antiplatelet agent instead. Based on clinical practice, we hypothesized this regimen may increase in-stent stenosis, potentially raising the risk of recurrent ipsilateral transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke. Design: Single-center, retrospective cohort study at a tertiary referral center. Methods: Patients with significant carotid artery stenosis treated with CAS (May 2005 to September 2024) were categorized into the anticoagulant (with or without antiplatelet therapy) or antiplatelet group (mono therapy or dual therapy). Primary outcome was in-stent stenosis at short-term (30 days to 8 weeks) and mid-term (1 year) follow-ups. Secondary outcomes included 30-day composite of thromboembolic and bleeding complications, reintervention, and other procedure-related adverse events. For the sensitivity analysis, multiple imputation was performed to address missing data. Results: Among 327 patients, 274 (83.8%) received antiplatelets and 53 (16.2%) anticoagulants. In-stent stenosis rates did not differ at short term (2.1% vs 2.8%, P = 1.00) but were higher in the anticoagulant group at mid-term (21.6% vs 7.4%, P = .01; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-9.39), with more symptomatic cases (10.5% vs 1.0%, P = .01). All occurred in direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) users, 75% also on single antiplatelet therapy. However, sensitivity analysis yielded a non-significant association (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.54-3.07, P = .56). Secondary outcomes showed no significant differences. Conclusion: Anticoagulant use, specifically DOACs, appears associated with increased mid-term (symptomatic) in-stent stenosis in the primary analysis. However, this association was attenuated in the sensitivity analysis. Prospective studies are warranted to guide post-CAS antithrombotic therapy in anticoagulated patients. Clinical Impact As the number of patients undergoing carotid artery stenting while receiving oral anticoagulation continues to rise, clinicians face uncertainty regarding optimal post-procedural antithrombotic therapy. This study identifies a potential association between anticoagulant use, particularly direct oral anticoagulants, and increased mid-term carotid in-stent stenosis. Confirmation in prospective studies is required. The innovation of this study lies in addressing an important evidence gap in carotid intervention practice, providing the first comparison of in-stent stenosis outcomes between anticoagulant- and antiplatelet-treated patients.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
In-Stent Stenosis or Occlusion After Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients Treated With Anticoagulants vs Antiplatelet Therapy
Date Crossref
28/06/2026
Éditeur
SAGE Publications
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery DiseasesPeripheral Artery Disease ManagementAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.