Risk Stratification in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Narrative Review
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for the majority of kidney cancers, with approximately 80,000 new diagnoses and over 14,000 deaths annually in the United States. Risk stratification is essential for prognostication, treatment selection, and clinical trial design across all disease stages. In localized and locally advanced RCC, pathological stage, histology, and grade remain the primary prognostic factors, while the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria serve as the standard risk stratification tool in the metastatic setting. However, current models rely predominantly on clinical and pathologic variables that act as indirect surrogates of tumor biology and do not account for the molecular heterogeneity inherent to RCC. This narrative review synthesizes and compares established and emerging risk stratification and prognostic models across all stages of RCC. Established models such as the IMDC criteria and the stage, size, grade, and necrosis (SSIGN) score demonstrate robust prognostic performance but are limited by their reliance on clinical and pathologic variables alone. Emerging biomarkers-including circulating tumor DNA, methylated DNA, artificial intelligence-based radiomics, and tissue-based molecular signatures-show promise for improving risk discrimination. The molecular heterogeneity of RCC underscores an urgent need for integrated molecular-clinical-pathologic prognostic tools tailored to specific histologic subtypes to enable more precise, individualized care.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Risk Stratification in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Narrative Review
- Date Crossref
- 26/06/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.