Human Blood‐Brain Tumor Barrier on a Chip to Investigate Personalized Treatment for Glioblastoma Patients
Rattachement africain : kr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The inherent characteristics of glioblastoma (GBM), including tumoral heterogeneity and invasive capacity, combined with the presence of the blood‐brain tumor barrier (BBTB), present challenges in developing effective treatment for GBM. Especially, the margins of GBM, where GBM cells infiltrate normal brain tissue, exhibit high resistance to therapies. Despite the difficulties in controlling tumor progression within this region, the GBM margin remains a critical area to be studied. Here we report a microengineered model that mimics the BBTB within the GBM margin, incorporating a 3D network of normal astrocytes and GBM cells isolated from patients newly diagnosed with GBM. The interaction between GBM cells and stromal cells results in increased vascular permeability, reactive gliosis, alterations in astrocyte behavior and immune responses to foster tumor invasiveness and progression. We compare patient‐specific tumor responses to conventional chemotherapy and immune polarization in our BBTB on a chip model with clinical outcomes, demonstrating the capability of the model to predict personalized drug responses. Our BBTB model may serve as a personalized tool to examine the interactions between tumors and normal brain tissue, ultimately facilitating the screening of personalized medicine for GBM treatment.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Human Blood‐Brain Tumor Barrier on a Chip to Investigate Personalized Treatment for Glioblastoma Patients
- Date Crossref
- 27/06/2026
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.