Why Participants Leave: A Qualitative Study Exploring Dropout from a Medication for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) Clinical Trial
Le résumé fourni par la source
High dropout rates in clinical trials can undermine data validity, particularly among individuals with substance use and mental health disorders. This qualitative study examined reasons for participant dropout from a randomized trial evaluating the Minds and Mentors Program, a Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention and peer support intervention, among adults receiving Medication for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD). Using a qualitative descriptive design, semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight participants who withdrew before completing the 12-week intervention or follow-up assessments. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically following Braun and Clarke’s framework. Four themes captured participants’ reasons for disengagement: (1) Structural and Logistical Barriers (e.g., work conflicts, transportation issues, and program discontinuation); (2) Procedural Fatigue and Assessment Burden related to lengthy or repetitive questionnaires; (3) Emotional and Relational Triggers tied to distressing group content and perceived stigma; and (4) Perceived Value and Program Continuity, where abrupt endings and unclear outcomes reduced motivation. Despite challenges, participants valued the study’s intent and supportive staff. Dropout in MOUD trials reflects the intersection of individual circumstances and modifiable design features. Implementing flexible scheduling, hybrid participation models, reduced assessment burden, trauma-informed facilitation, and transparent communication may improve retention and ensure participant-centered, equitable research outcomes.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.