Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Comparative Nutritional and Physicochemical Profiling of Five Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Varieties Cultivated in Burkina Faso

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
4Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : Burkina Faso, ro. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Since its introduction to Burkina Faso, quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) has become a promising crop for diversifying cereal-based diets in a context marked by food insecurity, childhood malnutrition, and micronutrient deficiencies. This study compared five quinoa varieties (Titicaca, Psankalla, Puno, Negra Colana, and Salcedo Inia) cultivated in Burkina Faso, with emphasis on their relevance to human nutrition. Therefore, physicochemical parameters, proximate composition, amino acid profiles, and mineral composition were determined. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed among varieties for most parameters. Salcedo Inia exhibited the highest energy value (372.56 kcal/100 g), while Titicaca exhibited the greatest protein content (17.89 g/100 g) and lipid content (5.82 g/100 g). Psankalla and Puno presented favorable essential amino acid profiles, including lysine, supporting their potential use in cereal-based complementary foods. Negra Colana exhibited the highest crude fiber content (9.66 g/100 g) and the highest concentrations of several minerals, including iron, calcium, magnesium, and zinc, suggesting potential relevance for dietary strategies to improve micronutrient intake. The swelling behavior of selected quinoa varieties also suggests their suitability for soft, rehydrated formulations suitable for vulnerable populations. In general, Burkina Faso-cultivated quinoa varieties demonstrated promising nutritional attributes that could support dietary diversification, improve protein quality, and increase mineral intake. To our knowledge, this is the first study to systematically compare the nutritional profiles of five quinoa varieties cultivated under Sahelian agroecological conditions. Beyond its relevance for Burkina Faso, this study provides novel evidence on the expression of genotype-dependent nutritional traits in quinoa outside traditional production regions, supporting climate-resilient crop diversification and the development of quinoa-based complementary foods for vulnerable populations in food-insecure settings.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Comparative Nutritional and Physicochemical Profiling of Five Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Varieties Cultivated in Burkina Faso
Date Crossref
26/06/2026
Éditeur
MDPI AG
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Seed and Plant BiochemistryAgricultural pest management studiesFood composition and properties

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.