A Multicomponent Wellness Program to Promote Self-Leadership and Wellness
Le résumé fourni par la source
This paper discusses an innovative, multicomponent wellness program designed to strengthen self-leadership and well-being among health professionals and faculty. The Marian K. Shaughnessy Nurse Leadership Academy at Case Western Reserve University spearheaded a series of sequential wellness initiatives, including BeWell: Flourishing in Self-Leadership, a faculty-focused program that connected wellness behaviors with leadership development through brief, experiential sessions emphasizing reflection, intentional self-care, and leadership confidence. In addition, the Marian K. Shaughnessy Nurse Leadership Academy implemented weekly interprofessional yoga classes that incorporated a variety of self-leadership themes before, during, and after weekly yoga practice. Yoga participants filled out pre- and postsurveys to assess the effectiveness of each class. Weekly yoga classes, tailored toward self-leadership themes, successfully brought the benefits that students and faculty were seeking. Following this initiative, the program expanded during a subsequent academic term to include a brief, classroom-based mindfulness intervention delivered within undergraduate and graduate nursing courses. Students completed pre- and postquestionnaires surrounding a guided meditation and awareness exercise. Collectively, interprofessional and classroom-based mindfulness initiatives represent a feasible strategy to promote self-leadership and support individual health and wellness in academic settings.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A Multicomponent Wellness Program to Promote Self-Leadership and Wellness
- Date Crossref
- 01/06/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.