Clinical and prognostic implications of pituitary tumor-transforming gene 1 in solid tumors
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: Pituitary tumor-transforming 1 (PTTG1) plays a crucial role in cancer pathogenesis and has been associated with survival outcomes and clinicopathological features in patients with various tumors. Therefore, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic and clinicopathological significance of PTTG1 expression in solid tumors. Methods: A comprehensive search of the PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science was performed to identify eligible studies until July 20, 2025. The hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Stata SE 12.0 software was used to perform the meta-analysis. Results: 22 studies from 21 articles were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that patients with high PTTG1 expression had poorer overall survival (OS)(HR:1.85,95%CI:1.55-2.20) and disease-free survival/recurrence-free survival (DFS/RFS) (HR:3.48, 95%CI:1.81-6.70). Subgroup analysis showed that high PTTG1 expression was mainly associated with worse OS in renal cell carcinoma(RCC),non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC),breast cancer(BC), esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(ESCC) and laryngeal cancer(LRGC). Furthermore, high PTTG1 expression was significantly associated with tumor stage (III-IV vs I-II), T stage (T3-4 vs T1-2), lymphatic invasion(Yes vs No) and metastasis (Yes vs No). Conclusion: PTTG1 may serve as a prognostic indicator in specific cancers.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Clinical and prognostic implications of pituitary tumor-transforming gene 1 in solid tumors
- Date Crossref
- 26/06/2026
- Éditeur
- Frontiers Media SA
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.