Patient-derived organoids across cancers reveal conserved tumor heterogeneity and actionable therapeutic vulnerabilities
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
We developed a pan-cancer patient-derived organoid (PDO) platform comprising 220 PDOs from 191 patients across 15 cancer types to advance functional precision oncology. Comprehensive characterization demonstrated high fidelity to parent tumors, with 93% histopathology concordance, 80% median genomic concordance for driver mutations, and a 0.85 median gene expression correlation. Expression profiles remained largely stable over 10 passages, ensuring reproducibility for long-term screening. Clonality analysis showed that 85% of dominant tumor clones were preserved, with genomic concordance directly reflecting clonal similarity. Even PDOs with lower concordance retained key oncogenic drivers, validating their utility as disease models. Functional assays revealed that 58% of PDOs from patients ineligible for US Food and Drug Administration–approved poly(adenosine 5′-diphosphate–ribose) polymerase inhibitors were sensitive to talazoparib, linked to DNA damage repair alterations. Furthermore, combination screens identified agents that overcome resistance, particularly in TP53 -mutant models. Our platform enables the investigation of targeted therapies and molecular drivers of drug sensitivity, providing translational insights for personalized treatment beyond current biomarker guidelines.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Patient-derived organoids across cancers reveal conserved tumor heterogeneity and actionable therapeutic vulnerabilities
- Date Crossref
- 26/06/2026
- Éditeur
- American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.