Disturbance-Event Recognition Model for Terrestrial Optical Cables Based on CNN-SVM
Résumé fourni par la source
Distinguishing between human-made interferences and natural background disturbances is of great significance for the safe operation of terrestrial optical cables because human-caused damage can be halted through timely intervention. To address the problem of small-sample disturbance recognition in distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) systems, this paper proposes a fused CNN–SVM classification model based on hybrid features. A convolutional neural network is employed to extract the high-level spatiotemporal features of disturbance signals, which are subsequently fused with statistical features and fed into a support vector machine for classification. Evaluated on open-source data, the proposed model achieves accuracy improvements of 9.1%, 8.7%, and 2.7% over the conventional CNN, the statistical-feature-based SVM, and the conventional CNN-SVM model, respectively. Furthermore, based on field-measured data, a dataset comprising 5664 samples was constructed, covering four typical disturbance-event types: background noise, drilling, knocking, and digging. The field classification results demonstrate that the three-layer convolutional structure of the model achieves a recognition accuracy of 98.5%. Both the ROC curves and multiple evaluation metrics indicate that the proposed three-layer fused CNN–SVM model delivers better classification performance and more balanced category recognition, offering a feasible reference for similar fiber disturbance engineering tasks.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Disturbance-Event Recognition Model for Terrestrial Optical Cables Based on CNN-SVM
- Date Crossref
- 26/06/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.