A Multi-Source Remote Sensing Workflow for Pegmatite-Related Rare-Metal Prospectivity Assessment Using GF-5A, ASTER TIR, and Structural Data

Le résumé fourni par la source

Pegmatite-related rare-metal exploration in high-altitude mountainous regions is commonly limited by rugged terrain, complex structural frameworks, and uneven bedrock exposure. This study presents a multi-source remote-sensing workflow for regional-scale rare-metal prospectivity assessment in the Pusharong area of western Sichuan, China, by integrating GF-5A Advanced Hyperspectral Imager (AHSI) data, ASTER thermal infrared (TIR) data, and structural interpretation. GF-5A hyperspectral data were used as the primary source for extracting mineral-related anomaly responses associated with muscovite, tourmaline, cookeite, and spodumene. Mixture Tuned Matched Filtering (MTMF) was applied to enhance weak target-related spectral responses, whereas Spectral Angle Mapper (SAM) provided an independent spectral-consistency constraint to reduce potential over-identification. ASTER TIR-derived Quartz Index (QI) and Feldspar Ratio Index (FRI) responses were used as supplementary lithological and differentiation-related background constraints rather than as continuous quartz–feldspar mineral-distribution maps. Structural interpretation was further integrated to evaluate the spatial relationship between mineral-related anomalies and favourable fault settings. Preliminary point-based validation shows a high degree of consistency between the mapped anomaly zones and available field or geochemical observations, with an overall consistency of 92.86% and a Kappa coefficient of 0.91. The integrated workflow delineated four prospective target zones for follow-up verification, with T1 showing the strongest multi-source support, followed by T2 and T3, whereas T4 is regarded as a lower-priority verification target. These results demonstrate the usefulness of the workflow for first-pass regional target prioritisation in complex mountainous terrain, but the delineated targets require further field, mineralogical, geochemical, and drilling verification before any deposit-scale interpretation can be made.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.