Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

A Comparison of High-Strength Structural Bolts: European ISO 14399 vs. American ASTM A325 & ASTM A490 Standards

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : ir. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

High-strength structural bolts are crucial for ensuring the safety of steel structures. However, different regions have their own standards for these bolts. This paper aims to compare the European ISO 14399 standard with the American ASTM A325 and ASTM A490 standards for high-strength structural bolts. The study examines various aspects such as material composition, mechanical properties, geometric specifications, testing requirements, and application suitability. ISO 14399 bolts are available in grades 8.8 and 10.9 and are commonly used in Europe and other areas that follow metric standards. On the other hand, ASTM A325 and A490 bolts are more prevalent in North America and are classified based on their carbon and alloy steel composition. It should be noted that A490 bolts are stronger than A325 bolts, with key differences in terms of tensile strength, yield strength, hardness requirements, preload specifications, and thread types. Furthermore, there are variations in testing protocols, with ISO requiring impact tests and CE marking, while ASTM emphasizes proof load and wedge tests. The findings of this study highlight that while both standards ensure structural reliability, engineers must take into account regional specifications, load requirements, and environmental conditions when selecting bolts. This research serves as a comprehensive reference for construction professionals working with international bolt standards, aiding in informed decision-making during structural design and implementation.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

La source scientifique ouverte est momentanément indisponible.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Engineering Structural Analysis MethodsStructural Load-Bearing AnalysisFire effects on concrete materials

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.