Code for: Pruden, M.J., Smith, J.A., Handley, J.C., Dietl, G.P. (In Review). Assessing the effects of time-averaging and differential preservation on the geohistorical AZTI Marine Biotic Index (geoAMBI).
Rattachement africain : us, ru, gb, se. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The code included here was used to produce the manuscript: Pruden, M.J., Smith, J.A., Handley, J.C., Dietl, G.P. (In Review). Assessing the effects of time-averaging and differential preservation on the geohistorical AZTI Marine Biotic Index (geoAMBI). Abstract: The youngest portion of the geohistorical record, including death assemblages of recently dead mollusks, provides otherwise unattainable context for understanding present-day biodiversity. Integrating molluscan death assemblage data into management-relevant biotic indices is a promising direction for applying geohistorical data in conservation practice. Realizing this potential requires understanding long-acting taphonomic processes that shape the geohistorical record. Here, we use a multi-century simulation parameterized on living molluscan communities from Long Island Sound (USA) to assess the effects of time-averaging and differential preservation on the geohistorical AZTI Marine Biotic Index (geoAMBI) under constant and changing environmental conditions. Allowing time-averaging to vary did not substantially influence geoAMBI scores, likely due to a novel reverse rank-order abundance data transformation that better accounts for taphonomic biases. Differences in preservational potential also mitigated time-averaging effects, as species assigned to different pollution-tolerance groups are differently preserved. Overall, these findings demonstrate the potential of geoAMBI to leverage the molluscan geohistorical record for environmental management while emphasizing the need for improved species-specific preservational potential data to more accurately assess past biological condition.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.