The place of systemic corticosteroids and methotrexate in the treatment of sarcoidosis: discussion of a new position
Rattachement africain : ru. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Sarcoidosis is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by the formation of granulomas in various organs and body systems. It manifests with a variety of symptoms, involving lungs, joints, skin, eyes, and other organs. The aim of this review was to discuss a new approach to long-term sarcoidosis therapy. Results . Treatment of sarcoidosis includes various approaches aimed at suppressing inflammation and granulomatosis progression, and preventing complications such as organ and system failure and fibrosis, but each approach is advisory in nature. For over half a century, corticosteroids have remained the standard first-line treatment, but their long-term use is associated with serious side effects. Methotrexate and other immunosuppressants offer alternatives to corticosteroids and are used when the latter are ineffective or intolerable. However, the choice of drug is personalized. Long-term glucocorticoid use is associated with an increased risk of developing diabetes, hypertension, osteoporosis, and infections. Therefore, it is important to monitor side effects and promptly adjust treatment strategies. Conclusion . The current position suggests switching to methotrexate after initial hormonal therapy, which provides long-term disease control with fewer side effects.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The place of systemic corticosteroids and methotrexate in the treatment of sarcoidosis: discussion of a new position
- Date Crossref
- 22/06/2026
- Éditeur
- Scientific and Practical Reviewed Journal Pulmonology
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.