Valuation of river ecosystem services by rural communities in the Colombian Orinoquia: A volunteer labor-for-restoration choice experiment
Rattachement africain : co, bo, us, ar, th, nl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Rice cultivation is highly water-intensive and alters both ecosystems and rural livelihoods. This study evaluates the willingness to contribute (WTC), measured in hours of volunteer labor, to restore ecosystem services in the Tocaría River (Casanare, Colombia), which has been affected by extensive rice cultivation. We surveyed 107 rural residents using a choice experiment with a labor-based payment vehicle and estimated preferences with a mixed logit model. Respondents expressed strong support for restoration, with WTCs of 17 hours/month for improving water quality, 11.7 hours/month for water availability, and 14.4 hours/month for expanding riparian vegetation. Crucially, participants preferred that civil society organizations manage restoration efforts, rather than government agencies or agribusiness. Additionally, based on the cost of paying the equivalent of this labor, the monthly economic loss caused by the degradation of the Tocaría River's ecosystem services was estimated at $84,510 USD. These findings highlight rural communities' willingness to actively engage in river restoration, offering labor as payment, and underscore the importance of participatory institutional arrangements in future watershed governance.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Valuation of river ecosystem services by rural communities in the Colombian Orinoquia: A volunteer labor-for-restoration choice experiment
- Date Crossref
- 23/06/2026
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.