Exploring vitamin D levels and the impact of vitamin D supplementation in pregnant women with diabetes: meta-analysis
Rattachement africain : ir, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) poses substantial risks to maternal and neonatal health, with a rising global prevalence. Emerging evidence suggests that vitamin D deficiency may contribute to the development of GDM. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between serum vitamin D levels and GDM, as well as the effects of vitamin D supplementation in pregnant women with diabetes. A comprehensive systematic search of the Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases was conducted through December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies involving pregnant women with GDM were included. Vitamin D supplementation was initiated during pregnancy, primarily in the second trimester, with dosages ranging from 400 IU/day to 50,000 IU/week. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Of the 2,250 identified articles, 68 studies met the inclusion criteria. A pooled analysis demonstrated significantly lower serum vitamin D levels in women with GDM compared with controls (Hedges’ g = − 0.45; 95% CI: −0.65 to − 0.25). In intervention studies, vitamin D supplementation significantly increased serum vitamin D levels compared with placebo (Hedges’ g = 1.38; 95% CI: 0.72 to 2.03), with a similarly significant improvement observed when comparing pre- and post-intervention levels (Hedges’ g = 1.74; 95% CI: 1.06 to 2.41). Vitamin D supplementation appears effective in correcting vitamin D deficiency among pregnant women with GDM and may improve metabolic outcomes. Further research is warranted to determine optimal dosing regimens, timing of supplementation during pregnancy, and the underlying biological mechanisms linking vitamin D status to glucose metabolism and insulin resistance in GDM.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Zabol University of Medical Sciences pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of Chester pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Islamic Azad University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Birjand University of Medical Sciences pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Zabol University of Medical Sciences, University of Chester et Islamic Azad University, avec 1 autre affiliation.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.