Apple Origin Classification and Sugar Content Prediction of ‘Fuji’ Apples Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Deep Learning
Résumé fourni par la source
Accurate apple origin identification and non-destructive internal quality evaluation are important for fruit traceability, quality grading, and post-harvest management. Unlike previous studies mainly focusing on origin classification, this study established a dual-task near-infrared spectroscopy framework integrating geographical origin classification and soluble solid content (SSC, °Brix) prediction for Fuji apples. Samples were collected from three representative production regions in China: Alar in Xinjiang, Yantai in Shandong, and Luochuan in Shaanxi. Near-infrared diffuse reflectance spectra were acquired from 375 apples, generating 3000 spectral samples for origin classification and 750 SSC-calibrated samples for sugar content prediction. For classification, six deep learning models were evaluated using standardized full-spectrum input without chemometric spectral preprocessing, and the Transformer achieved the best performance, with a test accuracy of 96.22%. For SSC regression, spectra were preprocessed using standard normal variate and Savitzky–Golay filtering. The DNN model achieved the best prediction performance, with MAE = 0.5958 °Brix, RMSE = 0.7333 °Brix, R2 = 0.8646, and Pearson r = 0.9338. These results indicate that near-infrared spectroscopy combined with deep learning can support both Fuji apple origin authentication and non-destructive local tissue SSC assessment.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Apple Origin Classification and Sugar Content Prediction of ‘Fuji’ Apples Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Deep Learning
- Date Crossref
- 20/06/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.