Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Trends in radiotherapy fractionation for bone metastases: a multi-center study of practice patterns before, during, and after COVID-19

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
16Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

PURPOSE: Trials show similar pain outcomes for hypofractionated and multi-fraction regimens in bone metastases, yet clinical adoption of hypofractionation remains limited. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic may have increased hypofractionation to minimize hospital visits and optimize resources. This study evaluated fractionation patterns before, during and after COVID-19 and compared pain outcomes between regimens in routine practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on treatment regimens for bone metastases between 2018 and 2022 were collected from 11 of 22 Dutch radiotherapy departments. Trends in utilization of hypofractionated (1-2 times 8 Gy) and multi-fraction (≥5 fractions) regimens were analyzed. For a subset of patients (n = 278), self-reported pain scores were collected at baseline, 4 and 8 weeks, and 3 months. Pain scores and pain response were compared for hypofractionated and multiple-fraction regimens, with complete (pain score 0) or partial (reduction ≥2 points) response classified as responders. RESULTS: A total of 17,336 patients were included, receiving 31,677 treatment regimens. The majority of the regimens were hypofractionated (n = 25,790, 81%). The use of hypofractionated regimens ranged from 34% to 99% between radiotherapy departments. A statistically significant increase in hypofractionated regimens was observed since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 (p < 0.001). In an exploratory analysis of patients with available pain scores, pain response in the three months post-treatment did not differ significantly between hypofractionated and multi-fraction regimens (56% vs. 63%, p = 0.406). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a high adoption of hypofractionated regimens, with a slight increase since the COVID-19 pandemic, though considerable variation remains between departments. Pain outcomes were comparable between hypofractionated and multi-fraction regimens, suggesting equal palliation and less treatment burden with hypofractionation.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Trends in radiotherapy fractionation for bone metastases: a multi-center study of practice patterns before, during, and after COVID-19
Date Crossref
30/06/2026
Éditeur
Korean Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Management of metastatic bone diseaseMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.