Systematic Quantitative Proteomics Defines Age, Sex, and Region-Dependent Remodeling of Lung Extracellular Matrix
Résumé fourni par la source
Abstract The lung extracellular matrix (ECM) governs tissue architecture, mechanics, and function, yet how it remodels with age across sex and anatomical regions remains poorly understood. Here, we performed a systematic multi-factor proteomic analysis of rat lungs to define age-, sex-, and region-dependent remodeling across the tissue landscape. Age emerged as the dominant source of variation, with a conserved aging signature modified by region- and sex-specific effects. Young lungs showed coordinated ECM assembly, balanced proteolysis, and active biosynthetic programs consistent with structural adaptability and mechanical resilience. In contrast, aged lungs exhibited accumulation of mature collagen crosslinks and a more stabilized matrix architecture, indicating progressive matrix maturation and reduced structural plasticity. These changes were accompanied by proteomic signatures of metabolic stress and immune activation, suggesting coordinated remodeling across ECM, metabolic, and immune pathways during lung aging. Aging effects varied across anatomical regions and were more pronounced in females, highlighting context-dependent trajectories within the broader aging program. Age also partially reshaped spatial proteomic heterogeneity across lung compartments. Together, these findings identify matrix stabilization as a central feature of lung aging that links structural remodeling to metabolic-inflammatory imbalance and increased pulmonary vulnerability.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Systematic Quantitative Proteomics Defines Age, Sex, and Region-Dependent Remodeling of Lung Extracellular Matrix
- Date Crossref
- 22/06/2026
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.