DNA barcoding and olfactory identification of attractive nectar sources for Aedes aegypti mosquitoes

Résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Adult mosquitoes rely on plant-derived sugars for survival, reproduction, and flight, yet the plant taxa that mosquitoes encounter in nature and the odors that make those plants attractive remain poorly understood. Most studies of mosquito attraction to plant odors have focused on candidate plants selected a priori, rather than plants linked to field-collected mosquitoes. Here, we combined plant DNA barcoding, semi-field behavioral assays, and volatile profiling to identify field-associated plant resources relevant to Aedes aegypti . Plant DNA recovered from mosquitoes collected across three Florida counties revealed broad plant associations, including 90 genera spanning 37 families, with several taxa recurring across counties or appearing prominently within particular localities. Behavioral experiments in semi-field sticky-trap assays found that five field-associated plant taxa were significantly attractive relative to blank controls, indicating that taxa associated with mosquitoes in nature can also function as attractive cues under semi-field conditions. GC-MS analyses of headspace collections from 42 plant taxa detected 211 volatile compounds and revealed substantial variation in both total emission rate and odor composition among taxa. Although several compounds, including α-pinene, limonene, 4-ethylacetophenone, 2-ethyl-1-hexanol, 4-ethylbenzaldehyde, and caryophyllene, were broadly distributed across plant groups, volatile profiles differed significantly among taxa and shared compounds often occurred at markedly different proportional abundances. The five behaviorally tested taxa likewise showed both overlap and divergence, sharing 17 compounds across all five taxa while differing in dominant constituents and total emissions. Together, these results show that Ae. aegypti interacts with a diverse set of plants in the field, and suggests nectar-seeking is shaped not simply by plant identity or total odor abundance, but by the composition and proportional structure of plant odors.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.