Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Agricultural Technology Adoption Among Smallholder Farmers: Evidence From a Development Project in Northern Uganda

1Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : Ouganda. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Agricultural development projects are expected to result in better livelihoods and welfare for target communities. However, questions remain as to whether these projects yield the expected outcomes which includes increased farm incomes. These expected outcomes usually arise from adoption of technologies and/or practices promoted under such projects. This study investigated the effect of technology adoption (TA) from an agricultural development project on beneficiary farmers’ farm income and their household’s expenditure. A cross‐sectional research design was used to sample 379 former project beneficiaries randomly. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the instrumental variable (IV) local average treatment effects (LATEs) model in STATA. Results showed that approximately 80% of the project beneficiaries adopted at least one of the crop production technologies promoted. This adoption rate was influenced by factors such as farming experience and gender, among others. The treatment effects results showed that adoption had a positive impact on farm income, with inconclusive evidence for expenditure. Additionally, the level of farm income was influenced by use of land owned, use of ox‐plow, and farmer’s experience. On the other hand, the level of expenditure was influenced by farmers’ level of education, use of hired labor, and farmer’s experience. Our findings show that adoption has a direct effect on farm income and consequently household welfare. For sustained adoption, there is a need for context specific programs that address the bottlenecks of adoption, including aspects of gender, as well as ownership of assets such as ox‐plows and land, which have all been shown to influence the level of adoption.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Agricultural Technology Adoption Among Smallholder Farmers: Evidence From a Development Project in Northern Uganda
Date Crossref
01/01/2026
Éditeur
Wiley
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Gulu University Gulu University, Ouganda (code pays fourni par la source)
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Kabale University Kabale University, Ouganda (code pays fourni par la source)
    Université ou école supérieure
  • National Agricultural Research Organisation Ouganda (code pays fourni par la source)
    Organisme public
  • Faculty of Agriculture and Environment Department of Rural Development and Agribusiness Gulu University, Ouganda (pays nommé en fin d’affiliation)
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Independent Researcher Gulu, Ouganda (pays nommé en fin d’affiliation)
    Institution
  • Nabuin Zonal Agricultural Research and Development Institute Ouganda (pays nommé en fin d’affiliation)
    Structure de recherche

Gulu University (Gulu University, Ouganda), Kabale University (Kabale University, Ouganda) et National Agricultural Research Organisation (Ouganda), avec 3 autres affiliations. Pays d’affiliation : Ouganda.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Agricultural Innovations and PracticesMicrofinance and Financial InclusionEconomic Growth and Development

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.