Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Studying When to Add Biological Therapy to Cytotoxic Therapy in Advanced Cancer Care Using Real World Data: How to Avoid Design Choices That Generate Immortal Time

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
22Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : es, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Since real-world data lack information on treatment assignment (usually the only information available is treatment prescription/administration) and early outcomes can happen in advanced cancer, some design choices may introduce immortal time due to selection or due to treatment strategy misclassification. OBJECTIVE: To illustrate design choices that would biassedly introduce immortal time and propose unbiased alternatives, using as a case study the estimation of the effects of different monoclonal antibody (mAb) sequencing strategies on overall survival in colorectal cancer patients. METHODS: We specified a target trial to estimate the effect on overall survival of initiating mAb within 8 weeks of starting first line chemotherapy versus initiating mAb with second line chemotherapy. The first biased design choice would be requiring the initiation of second line chemotherapy for eligibility. This was avoided by aligning eligibility with the initiation of first line chemotherapy. The second biased design choice would be excluding from the first line mAb strategy those who die during the grace period without starting mAb. This was avoided separately via cloning, censoring and weighting and by sequential emulation. RESULTS: There were 1014 eligible patients in GEMCAD 1401. The CCW approach estimated a 4-year survival difference (second-first line mAb) of 4.3% (95% CI) (-3.3%; 10.0%) and a risk ratio (RR) of 0.95 (0.88; 1.04). Sequential trial emulation estimated a survival difference of -2.8% (-7.5%; 1.2%) and a RR of 1.04 (0.98; 1.10). Biased analyses that introduced immortal time estimated an implausible early survival benefit for mAb initiation with second-line (6-month RR of 0.13 (0.03; 0.28)). CONCLUSIONS: Our results are compatible with no effect on survival by mAb sequencing. Misalignment of time zero, treatment assignment, and eligibility introduced immortal time.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Studying When to Add Biological Therapy to Cytotoxic Therapy in Advanced Cancer Care Using Real World Data: How to Avoid Design Choices That Generate Immortal Time
Date Crossref
01/06/2026
Éditeur
Wiley
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.