Aller au contenu principal
2026 article

Z-type Clavicle Fractures in Adults: A Retrospective Comparative Study of Outcomes

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

INTRODUCTION: Midshaft clavicle fractures with a "Z" deformity have historically been considered a surgical indication, although evidence is limited. This study compared rates of surgery to promote fracture healing between Z-type and non-Z-type clavicle fractures managed nonoperatively (nonsurgical cohort) and all-cause unplanned (re)operation rates among operatively and nonoperatively managed Z-type fractures (Z-type cohort). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients with midshaft clavicle fractures treated at two level 1 trauma centers between 2010 and 2023. Z-type fractures were defined as comminuted fractures with complete displacement and a vertically oriented butterfly fragment of ≥1 cm. The primary outcome was the rate of surgery to promote fracture healing in the nonsurgical cohort and the all-cause unplanned surgery rate in the Z-type cohort. RESULTS: In total, 35 nonsurgical Z-type fractures, 157 nonsurgical non-Z-type fractures, and 95 surgical Z-type fractures were included. Rates of surgery to promote healing were similar between nonoperatively managed Z-type and non-Z-type fractures (17% vs. 22%, P = 0.552). Multivariable analysis showed no association between Z-type fractures and surgery to promote fracture healing (odds ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.29 to 2.17; P = 0.737). Among Z-type fractures, all-cause unplanned surgery rates were comparable between nonsurgical and surgical management (20% vs. 28%, P = 0.333). However, when excluding implant removal, nonoperatively managed Z-type fractures had a significantly higher all-cause unplanned surgery rate (20% vs. 4.2%, P = 0.009). Surgical management of Z-type fractures had a lower rate of surgery to promote fracture healing compared with nonsurgical management (1.1% vs. 17%, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Among fractures initially treated nonoperatively, Z-type and non-Z-type midshaft clavicle fractures had similar rates of surgery to promote fracture healing. Surgical management of Z-type fractures demonstrated a lower rate of surgery to promote fracture healing compared with nonsurgical management. Regardless of initial treatment, all-cause unplanned surgery rates were comparable for Z-type fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Z-type Clavicle Fractures in Adults: A Retrospective Comparative Study of Outcomes
Date Crossref
22/06/2026
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Shoulder and Clavicle InjuriesTrauma Management and DiagnosisShoulder Injury and Treatment

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.