A literature review of GLP-1 agonists for the urologist: What do we know so far?
Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Objectives: Urologists are noting a surge in patients they see who are concurrently taking weight-loss injections, due to exponential rises in prescriptions of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) for medical and aesthetic purposes. This study aims to summarise current evidence around GLP-1RAs by categorising their unintended benefits and side effects across common urological conditions that may have important ramifications within the field of urology. Materials and methods: Comprehensive literature review using PubMed ® , MEDLINE ® and Google™ Scholar for relevant scientific articles published in English. Manual bibliography search and “ related article ” functions were employed to supplement original searches. Results: Current knowledge of the collateral impact of GLP-1RA on common urological conditions, such as erectile dysfunction (ED), UTIs, urolithiasis, urological malignancies and hypogonadism is conflicting and predominantly based on weak levels of evidence. Pubmed ® identifies 79 relevant studies relating GLP-1RA to the chosen common urological conditions. There are no randomised controlled trials (RCTs) dedicated to GLP-1RA whose primary outcome pertains directly to urological symptoms and/or sequelae. Conclusion: GLP-1RA may exert clinically relevant effects across multiple urological domains; however, current evidence is insufficient to draw definitive conclusions. Long-term safety data are lacking. Urologists should remain vigilant while prospective, urology-focused RCTs are urgently needed. Levels of evidence: Not applicable.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A literature review of GLP-1 agonists for the urologist: What do we know so far?
- Date Crossref
- 19/06/2026
- Éditeur
- SAGE Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.