Quantifying Element Importance for Mass Recovery from Population III Supernova Yield Fits
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Massive Population III (Pop III) stars are currently not observed, but their initial mass function (IMF) can be inferred through stellar archaeology: by fitting core-collapse supernova yield models to elemental abundances of low-mass, long-lived metal-poor stars. While prior work demonstrates that yield fitting can recover progenitor properties, it remains unclear which measured elements most control mass recovery quality and what level of IMF precision is achievable for a measured element set. We perform a systematic study of element importance for progenitor mass recovery. Using the A. Heger & S. E. Woosley (2010) yield grid, we generate mock observations, fit the initial mass, and evaluate the typical performance on the fractional mass recovery. Add-/remove-one-element experiments and comparisons among different baseline element sets are used to rank elements by importance. We find that the most important elements for accurate mass recovery are C, N, Na, and K, with O, Al, Co, and Ni consistently improving performance when available. Overall, with currently measurable elements from high-resolution spectroscopy, stellar archaeology can deliver practical Pop III IMF constraints, assuming the core-collapse supernova yield models provide a good representation of stellar evolution in the early Universe.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Quantifying Element Importance for Mass Recovery from Population III Supernova Yield Fits
- Date Crossref
- 18/06/2026
- Éditeur
- American Astronomical Society
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.