Strategic Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Australia–Systems Genomics Consortium (SALSA-SGC): cohort profile

Le résumé fourni par la source

PURPOSE: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rapidly progressive neurodegenerative motor neuron disease (MND) with heterogeneity in disease onset, progression and treatment response. The Strategic ALS Australia-Systems Genomics Consortium (SALSA-SGC) was established in recognition of the need for large data sets of clinical data matched with biological samples to enable and foster ALS research and better understanding of aetiology and biological mechanisms. SALSA-SGC brought together the major Australian MND clinics to set up sustainable infrastructure that could facilitate long-term human ALS research and clinical trials nationally and internationally. PARTICIPANTS: Between April 2016 and December 2024, SALSA-SGC recruited 1813 participants, including 1386 ALS/MND cases, 388 controls and 39 others (asymptomatic relatives and ALS mimics). Clinical data and biospecimens are available for 1333 and 1189 ALS cases, respectively, with longitudinal data spanning 4442 total clinic visits and 3201 samples. An open-access online data explorer showcases collected datasets. FINDINGS TO DATE: Detailed clinical and questionnaire data allow an in-depth description of the cohort, informing clinical and health policy research. Screening for known ALS large-effect risk variants identified 125 mutation carriers (11.5% from N=1059), including 70 with C9orf72 expansions. Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP)-array data (N=1088 cases; N=244 controls) have supported multiple published studies. SALSA-SGC resources are actively used by national and international researchers. FUTURE PLANS: Ongoing efforts aim to expand recruitment into regional Australia and enhance sample processing for cell-based studies. The SALSA-SGC resource is accessible by researchers under agreements governed by participant consent, human ethics committee guidelines and agreed use of data and samples.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.