Figure 3 from Early ctDNA Dynamics Predict Response to Mosperafenib in BRAF V600-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Le résumé fourni par la source
On-treatment ctDNA dynamics and response prediction. A, Median on-treatment ctDNA levels by treatment history: Log-transformed MTM/mL and change in log-transformed CFB. B, Across cycles, comparing BRAFi-naive (N) vs. BRAFi-experienced (Y) patients. BRAFi-naive (N) patients exhibited significantly deeper and more sustained ctDNA reductions compared with BRAFi-experienced (Y) patients. C and D, ctDNA dynamics by radiographic response: Median absolute levels (C) and CFB (D) stratified by best overall response. The dashed line in D indicates the −75% reduction threshold for molecular response. E, Kaplan–Meier analysis of molecular response: Patients achieving a −75% reduction in ctDNA by C1D15 showed significantly longer mPFS (281 vs. 43 days, P < 0.0001). F, Predictive value stratified by treatment history: Analysis showing that the durability of clinical benefit is linked to both the depth of molecular response and prior treatment status. G and H, Detailed trajectories by history and response: Combined stratification of absolute levels (G) and CFB (H) illustrating the distinct molecular patterns of naive partial responders (N_PR) vs. experienced progressors (Y_PD). CFB is expressed as a log ratio of MTM/mL. P values were calculated via the log-rank test. Dashed lines in D and E indicate mPFS. CFB is expressed in log difference. [Created in BioRender. Godfried Sie, C. (2026) https://BioRender.com/fnqpbyh.]
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Figure 3 from Early ctDNA Dynamics Predict Response to Mosperafenib in <i>BRAF </i>V600-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
- Date Crossref
- 18/06/2026
- Éditeur
- American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.