Prospective Midterm Outcomes of the PULSTA Self-Expandable Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve: The PULSTA CE Approval Study

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Patients with congenital or acquired right ventricular outflow tract dysfunction frequently require pulmonary valve replacement and are exposed to repeated surgical interventions due to prosthetic valve degeneration. The PULSTA self-expanding transcatheter pulmonary valve was designed to address a broad spectrum of native and surgically repaired right ventricular outflow tract anatomies. This study reports the midterm safety, hemodynamic performance, and durability outcomes of the prospective, multinational PULSTA CE approval trial (PULSTA Carpentier Edwards). METHODS: This premarket, multicenter, nonrandomized study enrolled 58 patients across 11 centers in 6 countries. Successful PULSTA implantation was achieved in 57 patients (98.3%), including 4 valve-in-valve procedures. Patients were followed for a median duration of 4.1 years. Primary end points included procedural or device-related serious adverse events, hemodynamic improvement, and sustained valve function. RESULTS: <0.001). Valve performance remained stable throughout follow-up, with 93.8% of patients exhibiting mild or less pulmonary regurgitation at 4.1 years. Freedom from reintervention was 98.2% at 5 years. One patient required a PULSTA-in-PULSTA implantation due to paravalvular leakage, and one case of infective endocarditis was successfully managed with antibiotic therapy. No stent fractures or structural valve deterioration were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The PULSTA transcatheter pulmonary valve demonstrated high procedural success, durable valve function, and sustained hemodynamic benefits. Its adaptability to diverse right ventricular outflow tract anatomies and favorable safety profile supports its role as an effective therapeutic option for patients with right ventricular outflow tract dysfunction. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03983512.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.