Aller au contenu principal
2026 article

Ten Year Update on the Online and Social Media Presence of Australian and New Zealand Urologists

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : au. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Social media is frequently used by clinicians to establish their professional identity, but engagement remains dubious. A 2015 study of Australian and New Zealand urologists demonstrated widespread use of social media, though no follow-up study has been conducted. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of urologists identified on the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons 'Find a Surgeon' page or on a group practice website. A thorough search on 'Google' and individual platforms (LinkedIn, X, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, TikTok) was performed to identify professional websites and social media accounts associated with each urologist. RESULTS: Amongst 516 urologists identified across Australia and New Zealand, most had a business website (79.0%). The mean number of social media accounts per individual was 1.72. LinkedIn (60.9%) was the most popular social media platform. Facebook (34.3%) and X (31.4%) were also commonly used by urologists. Few personal accounts on X (26.8%), Facebook (11.5%) and Instagram (21.8%) were active. Video-based platforms had the poorest uptake, with 8.3% of urologists identifiable on YouTube and 1.2% on TikTok. Academic urologists were significantly more likely to have a social media presence. There was a parabolic decline in social media use with more years since medical qualification, most notable on Facebook and X. CONCLUSION: The number of urologists with a professional website has increased substantially in the past decade, with a moderate rise in overall social media use. Most social media accounts are inactive. Unlike their international counterparts, ANZ urologists appear to have retreated to conservative digital platforms.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Ten Year Update on the Online and Social Media Presence of Australian and New Zealand Urologists
Date Crossref
16/06/2026
Éditeur
Wiley
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Social Media in Health EducationHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilityMobile Health and mHealth Applications

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.