Designing and optimizing the galvanized quenching and partitioning process: Evolution of microstructure and transformation behavior
Rattachement africain : us, kr, in. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
This work explores key aspects of designing and optimizing the quenching and partitioning process integrated with galvanizing (GI Q&P) for developing next-generation automotive steels. A conventional CMnSi steel was quenched below the martensite-start temperature, followed by partitioning at 460 °C for time durations (t P ) between 3 and 60 s, to simulate the GI Q&P process using a dilatometer. Carbon redistribution between martensite and remaining austenite was observed during initial quenching, which continued during isothermal holding at the quenching temperature (T Q ) and subsequent partitioning at 460 °C, leading to the stabilization of austenite. Transition carbides and/or cementite and bainite formation were observed during different stages of Q&P. Transition carbides formed during initial quenching and holding at T Q , and then dissolved during partitioning at 460 °C after 30 s, followed by precipitation of cementite. The amount of retained austenite increased with increasing T Q , while its carbon content was not affected much. With increasing t P , both the amount and carbon content of retained austenite first increased, attained a maximum value (∼15 vol pct after t P of 10 s and ∼0.82 wt pct carbon after t P of 30 s), and then decreased, due to austenite decomposition into bainite, and ferrite and cementite.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Designing and optimizing the galvanized quenching and partitioning process: Evolution of microstructure and transformation behavior
- Date Crossref
- 01/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.