From Complexity to Competency: International Nursing Perspectives on Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background/Objectives: Population aging has increased the demand for comprehensive and coordinated care for older adults, placing primary health care (PHC) nurses at the forefront of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) implementation. However, limited evidence exists regarding nurses’ experiences and educational needs related to CGA across different European healthcare contexts. This study aimed to explore the experiences, perceived challenges, and educational needs of PHC nurses regarding the implementation of CGA in five European countries. Methods: A qualitative study design was employed using five focus groups, one in each participating country: Greece, Iceland, Finland, Estonia, and Latvia. A total of 29 PHC nurses participated in semi-structured interviews. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Three overarching themes and nine subthemes were identified in relation to good practices in CGA: (1) embracing the complexity of holistic assessment; (2) balancing consistency with flexibility in clinical practice; and (3) advancing professional expertise through structured learning. Participants highlighted the importance of standardized assessment tools and effective multidisciplinary collaboration. At the same time, they reported significant gaps in formal education, limited organizational resources, and insufficient training in cultural competence, which hinder consistent CGA implementation. Conclusions: PHC nurses recognize the value of a holistic and structured approach to CGA but require clearer educational pathways and evidence-based training to address the complex needs of older adults. Strengthening curricula that emphasize interprofessional collaboration, practical competencies, and contextual adaptability may support more effective and sustainable implementation of CGA in primary care settings across Europe.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.