Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 other

Data from Urinary Biomarkers Objectively Measure Minimal Residual Disease in Non–Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
0Institutions déclarées
0Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Le résumé fourni par la source

AbstractPurpose: To determine whether carcinoma in situ (CIS) is a sufficient measure of minimal residual disease (MRD) in non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and evaluate alternative measures of MRD. Experimental Design: We evaluated the concordance of CIS on transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) and radical cystectomy (RC) to determine eradication rates of clinical CIS (cCIS) by TURBT alone and rates of occult pathologic CIS (pCIS) seen only in RC specimens. We studied a prospective cohort of patients with BCG-naïve high-grade NMIBC to evaluate pretreatment urinary cytology and urinary tumor (ut)DNA as alternative biomarkers. Results: Eradication of CIS was seen in 20% of patients (78/383). Positive urinary cytology, but not cCIS, was associated with pCIS. In our prospective cohort (n = 173), abnormal pre-BCG urine cytology, but not pre-BCG cCIS, had worse high-grade recurrence-free survival [HG-RFS; hazard ratio, 3.56; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.74–7.31, P < 0.001]. The median follow-up was 1.8 years (95% CI, 1.3–2.2). Among those with utDNA available, 84% (56/67) had sufficient DNA for genomic profiling. The 2-year HG-RFS rate in patients without an oncogenic alteration (n = 17) in their pre-BCG urine was 100% versus 60% (95% CI, 46%–78%) in patients with detectable oncogenic alterations (n = 38; P = 0.004). Area under the curve values for predicting 2-year HG-RFS were 0.52 for cCIS, 0.68 for cytology, and 0.74 for utDNA. Conclusions: We found ∼20% eradication of cCIS from TURBT alone. cCIS was a poor metric of MRD, performing worse than abnormal pretreatment urinary cytology and utDNA. These urine biomarkers are more objective MRD measures than cCIS for NMIBC risk stratification and treatment assessment.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Data from Urinary Biomarkers Objectively Measure Minimal Residual Disease in Non–Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
Date Crossref
17/06/2026
Éditeur
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Type
posted-content

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les sujets associés

Bladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsFerroptosis and cancer prognosisUrinary and Genital Oncology Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.