The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Piecewise Power-law Reconstruction of the Gravitational-wave Background
Rattachement africain : us, gb, pt, ca, au, de, hu, pr, jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract The NANOGrav 15 yr (NG15) data set provides evidence for a gravitational-wave background (GWB) signal at nHz frequencies, which is expected to originate either from a cosmic population of inspiraling supermassive black hole binaries or new particle physics in the early Universe. A firm identification of the source of the NG15 signal requires an accurate reconstruction of its frequency spectrum. In this Letter, we provide such a spectral characterization of the NG15 signal based on a piecewise power-law (PPL) ansatz that strikes a balance between existing alternatives in the literature. Our PPL reconstruction is more flexible than the standard constant power-law model, which describes the GWB spectrum in terms of only two parameters: an amplitude A and a spectral index γ . Concurrently, it better approximates physically realistic GWB spectra—especially those of cosmological origin—than the free spectral model, since the latter allows for arbitrary variations in the GWB amplitude from one frequency bin to the next. Our PPL reconstruction of the NG15 signal relies on individual PPL models with a fixed number of internal nodes (i.e., constant power law, broken power law, doubly broken power law, etc.), which are ultimately combined in a Bayesian model average. The data products resulting from our analysis provide the basis for fast refits of spectral GWB models.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Piecewise Power-law Reconstruction of the Gravitational-wave Background
- Date Crossref
- 16/06/2026
- Éditeur
- American Astronomical Society
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.