A Mixed‐Methods Toolkit for Evidence‐Based Diversity, Equity, and Inclusivity Policy in International Organizations

Le résumé fourni par la source

ABSTRACT Diversity, equity, and inclusion frameworks developed in Western contexts often fail when applied globally, as they inadequately account for cultural variation, linguistic diversity, and colonial legacies that persist in international organizations. This article presents a mixed‐methods toolbox for developing evidence‐based DEI policy tailored to international settings, drawing on three complementary analytical approaches. A literature review identifies systemic barriers, including bias rooted in colonial structures, a lack of diversity in leadership and innovation, and resistance to organizational change. A 2‐year organizational case study demonstrates how survey and communication platform analytics can reveal patterns of geographic representation, language accessibility barriers, and leadership dependency that create structural inequities even in organizations explicitly committed to DEI values. Bibliometric analysis of DEI action plans traces the evolution of discourse across three periods — from foundational diversity and equity themes (1994–2007), through disciplinary fragmentation (2008–2016), to consolidated frameworks emphasizing accountability and structural equity with inclusivity emerging as a distinct theme (2017–2022) — while exposing significant geopolitical siloing in international collaboration networks. Integrating findings across all three methods, we present an actionable toolbox that transforms research evidence into policy recommendations across three domains—diversity, equity, and inclusivity—each supported by specific implementation strategies and measurable accountability metrics. This framework prioritizes structural interventions that address the realities of international collaboration, including differential time zones, varied regulatory environments, platform accessibility constraints, and cultural variation in hierarchy and communication norms, offering organizations practical guidance for moving beyond performative statements toward substantive institutional change.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.