Anatomical Identification and Pressure Myography of the Rat Middle Cerebral Artery: A Comprehensive Protocol for Diverse Genetic Models
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract The middle cerebral artery (MCA) is critical for cerebral blood flow autoregulation and a primary site of cerebrovascular pathology in stroke, Alzheimer’s disease, and vascular dementia. Pressure myography enables precise ex vivo quantification of MCA structure and function, but requires accurate anatomical identification and careful vessel handling to ensure reproducibility across diverse rat genetic models. This chapter provides a comprehensive, step-by-step protocol for isolating and cannulating the rat MCA M2 segment for pressure myography. We detail precise anatomical landmarks to ensure consistent vessel selection across strains. The protocol includes optimized solutions, cannulation techniques, and pressure protocols validated across multiple rat models, including transgenic (TgF344-AD), diabetic (T2DN), consomic (SS.5 BN , FHH.1 BN ), and genome-edited strains. Extensive troubleshooting notes address common technical challenges, including vessel viability assessment, pressure integrity, and strain-specific autoregulatory ranges. This methodology bridges molecular genetic findings with fundamental cerebrovascular physiology, enabling researchers to characterize myogenic reactivity, passive mechanical properties, and structural remodeling in rat models of cerebrovascular disease.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Anatomical Identification and Pressure Myography of the Rat Middle Cerebral Artery: A Comprehensive Protocol for Diverse Genetic Models
- Date Crossref
- 16/06/2026
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.