Epidemiology of multiple sclerosis in a healthcare area of the Basque Country, Northern Spain: A population-based study (2009–2023)
Résumé fourni par la source
Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) prevalence has increased across Europe, yet contemporary population-based data from southern Europe remain scarce. Objectives: In this retrospective population-based cohort study conducted in a healthcare area of the Basque Country (Barrualde-Galdakao Integrated Healthcare Organisation [BGIHO]), northern Spain, we estimated prevalence, incidence, and clinical characteristics of MS. Prevalence was estimated on 31 December 2023 using the 2017 McDonald criteria, and incidence was assessed from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2023 using both symptom-onset and diagnosis-based definitions. Results: Prevalence was 131.8 per 100,000 inhabitants (95% CI 119.6-145.2); age-adjusted prevalence (European Standard Population [ESP2013]) was 125.4 (95% CI 113.3-138.1). Mean annual incidence (2009-2023) was 4.4 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI 3.9-5.1) by symptom onset and 5.3 (95% CI 4.7-6.0) by diagnosis date. Relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) accounted for 67.1% of cases; secondary progressive MS (SPMS) for 18.6%; and primary progressive MS (PPMS) for 14.2%. Median EDSS was 2 (IQR 0-5). Conclusions: MS prevalence in this healthcare area is high. The findings reflect an aging MS population with evolving clinical characteristics. The use of complementary incidence definitions provides insight into disease occurrence and healthcare detection. Continued epidemiological monitoring is warranted.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Epidemiology of multiple sclerosis in a healthcare area of the Basque Country, Northern Spain: A population-based study (2009–2023)
- Date Crossref
- 01/04/2026
- Éditeur
- SAGE Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.